Are We There Yet? Assessing Computer-Use Agents for Blind Users' Accessible Interaction with Desktop Applications (opens in new tab)
Satwik Ram Kodandaram, Monalika Padma Reddy, Xiaojun Bi, Jiawei Zhou, I. V. Ramakrishnan, and Vikas Ashok
arXiv · September 2026
Computer-use agents (CUAs) promise to operate graphical interfaces on a user's behalf, yet how well they serve blind screen reader users in real-world desktop workflows remains unclear. Through a three-week diary study with 8 blind users of OLLA, a screen-reader-accessible CUA prototype, we collected 1,258 commands across 12 desktop applications, along with screenshots, UI trees, model responses, and action traces. GPT-5 succeeded on 52.5% of commands, the highest of five models we evaluated on the same commands (alongside Claude Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 CU, UI-TARS, and Qwen3-VL). Trace analysis reveals recurring failures in grounding, planning, constraint tracking, and termination, while interviews show participants envision CUAs beyond end-to-end automation, as collaborative support for recovering from unfamiliar states, troubleshooting errors, learning applications, and working more efficiently.
@misc{Kodandaram_2026, title = {Are We There Yet? Assessing Computer-Use Agents for Blind Users' Accessible Interaction with Desktop Applications}, author = {Kodandaram, Satwik Ram and Reddy, Monalika Padma and Bi, Xiaojun and Zhou, Jiawei and Ramakrishnan, I. V. and Ashok, Vikas}, publisher = {arXiv}, year = {2026}, month = Sep, eprint = {2609.00524}, archivePrefix = {arXiv}, primaryClass = {cs.HC}, doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2609.00524}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00524}}